Reach Us +1-734-316-6828

The Unique Single-Stranded cfDNA Species in Retinoblastoma Patients Blood Plasma: Beyond New HPLC Technology

Kirill V Ermakov1*, Alexander A Bukhvostov1, Alexander S Vedenkin2, Sergey V Stovbun2, Anton S Dvornikov1, Anna V Semenova1, Dmitry A Kuznetsov1,2

1NI Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Federal Ministry of Health, Ostrovityanov St., 1, Moscow 117997, Russia

2NN Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygin St., 4, Moscow 119991, Ru

*Corresponding Author:
Ermakov KV
NI Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federal Ministry of Health
Ostrovityanov St., 1, Moscow 117997, Russia
Tel: +74954343690
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Received Date: October 22, 2019; Accepted Date: November 07, 2019; Published Date: November 14, 2019

Citation: Ermakov KV (2019) The Unique Single-Stranded cfDNA Species in Retinoblastoma Patients Blood Plasma: Beyond New HPLC Technology. Biomark J Vol.5 No.3:1

 
Visit for more related articles at Biomarkers Journal

Abstract

A significant population of ultrashort (50n-150n) single-stranded DNA fragments were found in exosome-free blood plasma of retinoblastoma patients (6.84 ng ml-1), but not in plasma of healthy donors. An original high resolution HPLC technique has been proposed to reveal and characterize this peculiarity. To solve this task, a novel molecular size exclusion-anion exchange analytical technique was developed. Its applicability to diagnostics and oncogenesis research is quizzed here.

Keywords

Retinoblastoma; Blood plasma; cfDNA; ssDNA; HPLC.

Abbreviations

SPM: Sulfonated Polysulfone Membranes; PRP: Polymethylamidopropylmethacrylamide; cfDNA: Cell-free DNA; ssDNA: Single-Stranded DNA; SEAE: Size Exclusion-Anion Exchange

Introduction

The DNA repair machinery damage involves a marked DNA polymerase β hyperexpression and its processivity limitations in retinoblastoma cells [1,2]. This may promote some tumor DNA release as long as the DNA repair related short polydeoxyribonucleotides are going to get lost in a chaotic modulation of chromatin structure [3-5].

So the DNA repair caused release of short single-stranded DNA sequences is likely to contribute to the blood circulated DNA pool in retinoblastoma patients.

To reveal such a contribution, the extra-high resolution ssDNAdetecting tool is needed. It is hardly possible to overestimate this requirement since the conventional agarose gel electrophoresis and PCR procedures are not selective and sensitive enough as long as the pg-ng concentration range for short (smaller than 100n) ssDNA detection in clinical samples is the case [1-5]. Taking this into account, the aim of a present work was to develop a new chromatographic technique suitable to solve the above specified task, a high resolution ssDNA analysis in liquid biopsies.

Materials and Methods

Four 5.0 year old male retinoblastoma (2A) patients and four adult male healthy donors were taken for blood plasma cfDNA extraction according to [4,5]. A consequent treatment of DNA extract with exonucleases lambda, III and S1 [3] was followed then by a cascade ultrafiltration on K75/K25 SPM TechSep (Mirabel, France) membranes [6]. An enzymatic treatment of samples was conventionally carried out to purify ssDNA [3] aiming for a double-stranded DNA hydrolysis followed by ultrafiltration removal of the resulted free nucleotides and nucleases λ, III traces [3,6]. As a negative control, the ssDNA destroying nuclease S1 treatment has been employed [3]. The enzymatic treatment steps were performed to engage a known peculiarities of phage λ 5’-exonuclease and E.coli 3’-exonuclease III, both digesting doublestranded DNA [7] and Aspergillus orizae nuclease S1 digesting ssDNA [7]. All enzymes were purchased from Worthington Corp., USA. Enzymatic treatment regime: 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.40), 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, 15 mM EDTA, 60 min, +37°C [3,6,7]. A resulted fraction of lambda/III-nuclease resistant 25 kDa-75 kDa compounds was analysed by size exclusion/anion exchange (SEAE) HPLC.

For this purpose, our original procedure has been employed. Its key parameters are the followings:stationary phase-polymethyl amidopropylmethacrylamide; column PRP-X600 AE, 4.6 × 150.0 mm, 5.0 micrometer particles, 1.6 meq/ml (Hamilton Corp., USA); 1,800 p.s.i., 22°-25°C, 0.8 ml/min elution rate. Both synchronous linear elution LiCl2 (0-2.5 M) and pH (8.0-4.0) gradients were formed on 100 mM Tris/acetonitrile (85:15, v/v). Waters/Hamilton compatible Breeze 200SLE Analytical System, W2998 UV-Detector (254 nm), W600E gradient former (Waters, Inc., USA). Sample loading: 80-100 g DNA in 50 microliters of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)/acetonitrile (85:15. v/v). All ssDNA measurements and 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis DNA size control were performed as described [3].

For a positive control, the mixtures of equal amounts (5.0-6.0 ng/ml) of different size Poly (dT) single-stranded sequences were applied onto a column. Poly(dT)50, Poly(dT)100 and Poly(dT)150 species (ThermoFisher Corp., USA) were employed.

Results

The content of ssDNA in the blood plasma of patients is 6.84 ± 0.56 ng ml-1, this DNA population consists of ultrashort fragments (50n-150n). In the control, a smaller population of ssDNA (2.40- 2.82 ng ml-1) was found consisting of the larger 350n-400n sequences (Figure 1). Besides, the blood circulating ssDNA population is found to be heterogeneous in retinoblastoma patients but not in healthy donors (Figure 1).

biomarkers-retinoblastoma

Figure 1: Fractionation of plasma ssDNA fragments by HPLC on Polymethylamidopropylmethacrylamide. (1) retinoblastoma patient, 2-healthy donors, 3-S1 nuclease control. Arrows show the retention times for 50n, 100n and 200n single-stranded poly(dT) markers (Takara Biomedical Corp., Rep. Korea). (2) 0% Agarose gel electrophoresis: track 1ssDNA, 50n-150n molecular size range, Rt=15-20 min; track 2-ssDNA, 200n-300n molecular size range, Rt=8-12 min.

Noteworthy, the retention time (Rt) values detected in a positive control fractionation runs (see Methods) were found equal to 19-20 min (Poly(dT)50), 16-17 min (Poly(dT)100) and 12-13 min (Poly(dT)150).

Discussion

A separation efficiency shown by our original SEAE-HPLC technique allows to reveal the size/charge-different populations within the ssDNA pool in a cancer patient blood plasma (Figure 1). Noteworthy, this fractionation procedure provides with a far better resolution level as compared to the dPCR engaging DNA size measurements and/or to a routine agarose gel electrophoresis [3-5]. Moreover, the PCR engaging DNA size measurement might be an inadequate choice once these DNA fragments have the DNA repair related origin. In this case, the release of ssDNA species would occur in the DNA repair process usually accelerated in malignancies [1-4].

So an original procedure of SEAE-HPLC we proposed can be used then in biochemistry as well as in molecular biology, biotechnology, experimental oncology, analytical and clinical chemistry. Paying attention to a clear heterogeneity of ssDNA pool within the 50n-150n molecular size range (Figure 1), a certain advantage of our HPLC analytical tool should be emphasized.

As per the positive control findings (see Results), it seems nothing but a clear sign of high resolution capabilities of our technique.

The molecular lengths of smallest ssDNA ever found in the human blood plasma cfDNA pool, either healthy or any disease diagnosed patients (cancer, infections, autoimmune pathologies) were not smaller than 770n, contents level 6.5-18.0 ng/ml [4,5,8,9]. This is the reason why we prefer the term “ultrashort” to pay attention to uniqueness of two facts: (1) high resolution of HPLC technique we proposed and (2) very small sizes of ssDNA detected (50n-150n). The latter fact, as well as a clear heterogeneity of the retinoblastoma patients ssDNA pool (Figure 1), is an attention catching point with no any reliable explanation beyond. Obviously, this should be a part of agenda of our forthcoming studies.

A probable diagnostic potential of ultrashort ssDNA as the early markers capable of appearing in the blood plasma prior to protein oncomarkers should be further investigated.

The question we might expect: Would it be a possible to claim that our novel method might specifically detect ultra-short cellfree DNA (cfDNA) from retinoblastoma patients? The answer is “no”. Not just cfDNA of a certain size but, exclusively, their initially originated single-stranded species (ssDNA) are in a focus here with an emphasize on their possible DNA-repair related origin.

A remarkably high detection sensitivity of our SEAE-HPLC technique is no doubt helpful for further studies aiming to find out a link between the DNA repair damages in carcinogenesis and the appearance of the broken DNA repair products, short ssDNA [1,2], in the patients blood plasma. So our method is to be treated as a reliable tool for both oncogenesis research and laboratory diagnostics purposes.

To the best of our knowledge, this is a first report ever on 50n-150n ssDNA fragments presented in reliably detected ultralow concentrations in cancer patient blood plasma to the contrast with healthy controls. On another hand, it should be safe to say that the present study is just a preliminary technical report with a certain potential for further clinical and experimental research. It should be also outlined that this work deals with a new, previously not known [3-5] combination of molecular size exclusion and anion exchange separation principles in detection of a certain ssDNA populations within a clinical liquid biopsy samples. This itself is a key technological message of a present study.

Our assumption on the DNA repair related origin of the tumorreleased ultrashort ssDNA fragments deserves further extensive studies being a new contribution to understanding of the carcinogenesis molecular mechanisms.

Comparing our method with a massive sequencing (MPS) technology [8], we have to state that a random, indiscriminate, nature of the DNA repair resulted short ssDNA fragments makes MPS limited to the DNA size estimation only. A primary structure of DNA chains is not in a focus once the DNA repair related origin of ssDNA has been assumed. So our HPLC approach might be treated as a reasonable alternative to MPS. Being about the same sensitive as MPS, our SEAE-HPLC technique provides nearly the same level of resolution available at ~30-40% lower expenses compared to MPS, once an appropriate HPLC system is in a lab equipment list.

A mere idea to combine both gel filtration and ion-exchange separation modes in a single chromatographic run for ssDNA analysis was, in fact, presented and discussed earlier but with no link to clinical chemistry purposes [10]. A present work is about to gain the latter benefit.

As seen in a study [11] it is hardly possible to overestimate a clinical validity (its undercovered potential including) of the cfDNA studies which technical capabilities are usually limited by the factors affecting resolution-selectivity and resolution-sensitivity of PCR, spectrometric and electrophoretic procedures invilved [11]. This is a reason to search for an additional, not alternative, techniques to upgrade an arsenal of cfDNA analysis methods. Recent studies have suggested that single-stranded DNA library preparation can enrich short, or even ultra-short, DNA species from healthy individuals, cancer patients and transplant recepients. As per the ultra-short ones (50n-150n), these very specific markers [4] are clearly within a «dark zone» due to their poor detectability in liquid biopsies [4]. To make them datactable, i.e. «visible», some top-sensitive and high resolution HPLC method might be employed (Figure 1).

Being a preliminary result, this work is an attention catching signal for those ones involved into a long lasting cfDNA studies of all sorts [3-5] including clinical and analytical chemistry, molecular medicine, etc. After all, this is the first report ever on a SEAEHPLC version «nicely applicable» for analytical purposes once the blood circulated short ssDNA fragments are in a focus.

Conclusions

A new chromatographic procedure described is to be taken as an efficient tool for short ssDNA sequences detection in biomaterials which itself means a promising approach to ongoing studies on diagnostic relevance of cfDNA species in oncology.

Noteworthy, a resolution capabilities of this HPLC procedure look better as compared to most known chromatographic DNA separation versions, PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. This work presents data of unconventional cell-free ssDNA isolation that should be of interest to the liquid biopsy technology community.

References

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Recommended Conferences
Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh